| |
|
|
|
2621 Bay Street Suite
A, Saginaw MI 48602 |
Customer Testimonial: "Until Total Solutions Group performed their audit of our long distance charges, we thought our vendor-provided billing CDs gave us all the information we needed to validate our charges. It turns out that some critical call type categories were not broken out on the CD, nor provided for in our contracts, and we were being stuck with ridiculously high rates that were hidden from us. With sizeable new discounts on these call types, we will save many thousands every month."
--IT Director, Mid Michigan Hospital
|
|
 |
|
March 2004 |
|
Volume
2, Issue
3 |
 |
|
Public Wireless Access: Wait and See or Jump Right In? |
| |
The prospect of universally available public access wireless
networks is receiving significant recent attention from both the
press and IT managers. The idea that consumers and corporate
customers can access the Internet and e-mail from nearly any public
space is indeed alluring. But it is far from today's reality of
spotty service from a baffling array of vendors in a limited number
of locations. The question on many IT managers' minds is whether or
not it is worthwhile to equip employees with wireless-enabled
devices so that they can theoretically be more productive away from
the office.The two most popular wireless technologies now are Wi-Fi and
third-generation (3G) cell phone data networks. Currently, there are
no clear answers about which service is better, though the ubiquity
and rapidly falling price of Wi-Fi make it a more obvious choice to
reach a positive ROI.
Wi-Fi: Speedy but Highly Localized
Because of the highly localized nature of Wi-Fi signals,
service tends to be limited to the immediate area surrounding a
Wi-Fi hotspot. Even the largest hotspot service providers, such as
Boingo and T-Mobile, provide little more than an aggregated square
mile or two of coverage nationwide. Therefore, it is important to
consider what locations users will be connecting from because each
service provider has exclusive agreements with particular airports,
restaurants, and hotels. Some companies may wish to work with a
wireless service aggregator to maximize usable coverage areas.
Wi-Fi ROI Pros
The following make Wi-Fi a good choice:
- Wi-Fi's standard architecture, ease of use, and high
speed are essential for nontechnical personnel to be able to
connect without making costly support calls to the corporate IT
department.
- Wi-Fi's increasing ubiquity means that users can connect
from both remote locations and their home networks, helping to
increase ROI on a wireless device investment.
- Flat-rate service plans allow users to work without
worrying about reaching an allocated limit of kilobytes per
month.
Wi-Fi ROI Cons
On the negative side for Wi-Fi as a data network are the
following:
- To approximate a large coverage area, users need to sign
up with multiple service providers with multiple user names and
passwords, which adds complexity, decreasing the chance that
users will regularly log on and reap the benefits of the
service. Wireless aggregators can help to alleviate this
problem, but their services are pricey.
- Wi-Fi is inherently insecure, forcing companies to
install security software, which adds to the cost and complexity
of a wireless deployment, and thus negatively affects ROI.
However, such software is critical if business information is
being transmitted on public wireless networks. Vendors such as
Senforce provide software to enforce location-based security
policies.
Wi-Fi Options
Companies that are looking to equip employees with
Wi-Fi-enabled devices have a few options to consider:
- Wi-Fi handhelds. Products such as Palm's Tungsten C and
HP's iPaq H5550 feature built-in 802.11b antennas that can
connect to public Wi-Fi networks. Using built-in mini Web
browsers allows users to connect to the Internet and corporate
portals. Built-in e-mail allows connections to most popular mail
servers. Handhelds are a good choice because of their
portability, low cost, and ease of use, all of which can lead to
a positive ROI. However, they are easily lost, stolen, or
broken, so data security is a top concern and companies need to
be sure to include security software on all mobile devices.
Also, handhelds' limited screen sizes can sometimes make the Web
experience challenging, though current devices are greatly
improved in this area.
- Wi-Fi-enabled notebooks. Most modern laptop computers
contain built-in Wi-Fi capabilities. Though laptops are far more
expensive than handhelds, they can make up for that higher cost
by allowing mobile users to be more productive than they would
be with handhelds. The same security concerns mentioned for
handhelds apply here as well.
3G Cell Phone Networks: Nationwide But Expensive
The other major option facing companies is cell phone data
networks. This method of wireless connectivity uses so-called 3G
digital cell phone technology to provide wireless data services many
times faster than dial-up but significantly slower than Wi-Fi. 3G
cell phone networks are different from Wi-Fi networks in that they
are not localized but rather are part of the nearly nationwide cell
phone voice network. Thus, where Wi-Fi access is spotty,
concentrated in hotels and restaurants, 3G data networks can be
accessed almost anywhere a cell phone works.
3G ROI Pros
On the plus side for 3G cell phone data networks are the
following:
- Near nationwide coverage allows users to access the
network from practically any location in a metropolitan area.
Greater ease of access can help lead to higher ROI.
- Because the networks are nationwide, companies do not
need to sign up with multiple service providers as is necessary
with Wi-Fi, decreasing billing complexity.
3G ROI Con
Some of the negative aspects of 3G are as follows:
- Cell phone network data access is far more expensive than
access with Wi-Fi networks, which are increasingly being offered
as a free public service.
- Speed is generally lower than with Wi-Fi.
- Most plans charge on a per-minute or per-kilobyte basis,
which forces users to be cognizant of the amount of data they
are downloading. This practice leads to higher costs and less
usage, both of which negatively affect ROI.
3G Options
Companies that are looking to equip employees with 3G-enabled
devices have a few options to consider:
- 3G-equipped handhelds. Handheld devices, such as the Palm
Tungsten W, feature built-in 3G network connectivity and can
work as both phones and PDAs. They also contain built-in Web
browsers and e-mail programs. These devices work in much the
same way as Wi-Fi-equipped handhelds, with the major difference
being that they have an always-on data connection to the cell
phone network.
- Cell phone network cards for laptops. Most of the major
cell phone carriers sell network cards for laptops. These plug
into a laptop's PC slot just like any other peripheral, allowing
the laptop to establish a data connection with the carrier's
cell phone network.
- Smart phones. Some vendors have introduced hybrid
devices, such as T-Mobile's Sidekick, that bridge the gap
between cell phones and handhelds. These devices typically
feature a swiveling display and mini keyboard along with a
nearly full-featured Web browser and e-mail client. Some of
these devices are aimed at consumers, but companies can expect
to see enterprise-oriented smart phones in the near future.
Their small size and relatively low cost make them a good choice
for employees who need simple e-mail and Web access.
- Internet-enabled cell phones. Probably the least viable
choice for mobile data connectivity is mini-Web browsers built
into 3G cell phones. Given the small size of most cell phone
screens and the lack of a full-size keyboard, cell phones are
not ideal devices for anything but the most basic Web surfing.
Maximizing Wireless ROI
The low-hanging fruits of wireless applications are
specialized, custom software packages aimed at particular vertical
market segments, such as handheld diagnostics software for field
mechanics or mobile medical databases for healthcare workers. These
applications undoubtedly provide ROI potential because of their
specialized nature. Beyond these custom applications, however, is
there value in giving employees access to offsite wireless networks?
The answer depends on the type of employee. Because different
employee types can benefit to varying degrees from wireless access,
rather than handing out equipment on an ad hoc basis, companies
should give wireless devices to employees in roles that are suited
for netting a positive ROI on wireless access. They include:
- Salespeople. Because salespeople are often offsite and
are most likely to use free time productively, they are the
natural first choice for wireless access. Salespeople can use
wireless devices to meet with clients in neutral settings such
as hotels or restaurants. They can also remotely read and write
e-mail and look up sales and inventory information on a company
portal. Salespeople's natural tendency to use free time
productively can help them reach a positive ROI on wireless
access.
- Offsite customer service personnel. Support employees who
travel to customer sites also can help reach a positive ROI for
wireless devices. Giving support workers the ability to remotely
download service manuals or technical documents can help
increase their productivity, and giving field personnel
assignments wirelessly helps them spend less time calling into
headquarters.
- High-level executives. Because many high-level executives
spend significant portions of their time traveling, they can
benefit from wireless access. Having access to e-mail and
critical real-time business metrics can help make an executive's
rare downtime more productive.
- Traveling IT personnel. IT employees who travel to remote
sites can also benefit from having mobile access to corporate
data. One method to ensure a positive ROI is to enable mobile
support personnel to remotely assess and configure corporate IT
systems. For example, Sonic Mobility's sonicadmin allows workers
to remotely manage Microsoft Exchange and Active Directory
servers as well as establish VT100 emulation sessions.
To maximize the ROI on wireless access, organizations must
also consider what sort of information to provide to mobile users.
Remote e-mail access is the most common application because it is
easy and inexpensive to deploy and because most employees can take
advantage of it to increase productivity outside the office.
In addition, making the company's enterprise portal available
to remote users can help to ensure a positive ROI. Because they are
naturally designed to repurpose corporate application information
for the Web, portals are ideal for presenting information to users
who are connecting wirelessly. Companies that are already deploying
an enterprise portal will need to spend only a small incremental
amount (if anything) to make it available to wireless users.
Another option is a specialized software architecture designed
to send corporate data to mobile users. One example of this approach
is JP Mobile's SureWave Enterprise Server, which allows companies to
manage corporate data synchronization from a common platform.
Recommendations
Mobile wireless connectivity options, as they stand today, are
fairly limited and are part of a rapidly evolving market. In a
year's time, the idea of paying for public Wi-Fi access may be
obsolete. Indeed, it is already becoming clear that the
public-access Wi-Fi business model is most likely not viable over
the long term, especially as cities, towns, and chambers of commerce
begin to deploy free networks in densely populated commercial areas.
Likewise, cell phone carriers may introduce lower-cost
unlimited data access plans with higher speeds than are currently
available. Most likely, however, vendors will begin introducing
hybrid wireless devices with technology to connect to both Wi-Fi and
3G networks. The potential combination of ease of use, high speed,
and nationwide availability will allow companies to more easily
realize a positive ROI. With this technology just over the horizon,
companies should make sure to minimize risk by not agreeing to
long-term, inflexible service provider contracts.
This is not to say that companies cannot reach a positive ROI
from current wireless technologies. If a company identifies specific
work roles and applications that are well suited for mobile access,
it can make wireless access work. However, those without a pressing
need to equip mobile workforces should take a wait-and-see approach
until the public wireless access market matures.
|
|
WE SAVE YOUR COMPANY A LOT OF THIS ON YOUR BOTTOM LINE! ASK OUR CLIENTS!!
|
|
| Americans
Love and Hate Their Mobile Phones |
|
Nearly one in
three (30%) American adults say the cell phone
is a the invention they most hate but cannot live without,
according to the eighth annual Lemelson-MIT Invention Index
study. The cell phone narrowly beat the alarm clock (25%)
and television (23%) for the distinction in the survey,
which gauges Americans’ attitudes toward invention. Shaving
razors, microwaves, coffee pots, computers and vacuum
cleaners were also cited as essential, yet despised,
inventions.
While the Lemelson-MIT Invention
Index found a vast majority of Americans (95%) believe
inventions have improved the quality of life in the United
States, their strong feelings toward cell phones
illustrate both the benefits and unintended consequences of
innovation.
"Cell phones have clearly been
beneficial in terms of increasing worker productivity and
connecting people with family and friends," said Merton
Flemings, director of the Lemelson-MIT Program, a non-profit
organization that celebrates inventors and inventions.
"However, the Invention Index results show that the benefits
of an invention sometimes come with a societal cost."
The good news, Flemings added, is
that invention is cumulative. "Side-effects or limitations of an
invention create new opportunities for further innovations," he
said.
In the case of the cell phone,
MIT Media Lab researchers Chris Schmandt and Stefan Marti
recognized an opportunity to solve the societal problems by
making mobile communication
devices socially intelligent.
"Most people dislike cell phones
because they either feel tethered to them or they are
annoyed by others who use them in inappropriate public
places, such as restaurants or movie theaters," Marti said.
"We are exploring ways to give these devices human-style
social intelligence, which means that they would know what
we as owners expect them to do, and especially what not to
do, without our having to tell them explicitly every time."

|
|
Commissioner's Comments Bode
Poorly
For AT&T VoIP Petition |
| FCC Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy yesterday defined voice-over-IP
calls in a manner that indicates she will oppose AT&T's petition seeking
VoIP status -- and an exemption from paying $8 billion in annual access
charges to incumbent carriers -- on long-distance calls carried over its
IP network.
To be considered VoIP, calls should use IP "on at least one
end of the call," Abernathy said while calling for a new VoIP regulatory
framework during a speech delivered at Catholic University in
Washington, D.C.
|
|
Protecting the Cellphone
User's Right to Hide |
|
For years, advertisers
have dreamed of taking advantage of technology that discloses a cellphone caller's location to send text messages promoting nearby
restaurants and retail stores. But until recently, when wireless
carriers began to upgrade their systems to comply with a federal mandate
that they be able to locate anyone dialing 911, few wireless companies
had the ability to track the whereabouts of all of their customers.
Now cellphone carriers
are planning to roll out features that allow companies or other
cellphone users to know a user's location. Already, AT&T Wireless offers
"Find Friends," which lets users locate up to five others within a
certain distance.
"Marketers are foaming at
the mouth about the prospect of sending e-coupons," said Jason Catlett,
founder and president of the Junkbusters Corporation, which helps
customers protect their privacy.
Currently, cellphone
users have only two options when it comes to how their movements are
tracked: they can turn the feature on or off, although 911 calls will
always show their location. Researchers at the Bell Labs division of
Lucent Technologies have developed software that will give users
more options.
"There is no
one-size-fits-all solution to privacy," said Rick Hull, director of
network data and services research at Bell Labs. "Our technology puts
the user in control of who gets their information and under what
circumstances."
The software, known as
Privacy-Conscious Personalization, works like this: Users set their
preferences on when they want their whereabouts disclosed through
menu-based screens on the cellphone or at the wireless carrier's Web
site.
They can choose to restrict knowledge of their location depending
on their activity, the time of day or who is requesting the data. When
someone asks for the user's location, the request is quickly filtered
through the user's preferences and the information is either shared or
withheld.
For example, traveling
employees may want their bosses to be able to locate them during the day
but not after 5 p.m. Others may want to receive coupons from coffee
shops before 9 a.m. on weekdays but not on weekends when they sleep in.
Some may want their friends alerted only when they are within one mile,
but not 10 miles.
"This is very
fine-grained," Mr. Hull said. "Maybe a salesman wants their important
customers to know where they are, but not when they are visiting a
competitor down the street, so they could set their preferences only for
an accuracy of a few miles."
The location of a
wireless phone is tracked either by the Global Positioning System or
land-based triangulation, which calculates the time it takes signals to
travel among cellphone towers. G.P.S. is the more accurate of the two
methods, although most wireless companies use a combination of both to
find their customers.
Under the government's
911 regulations for cellphones, carriers using G.P.S. must be able to
locate about one-third of wireless callers within 160 feet, or within
320 feet using land-based triangulation.
Trying to manage the
preferences of millions of cellphone users as their calls are being
connected has the potential to overwhelm a wireless network. To prevent
a bottleneck, Mr. Hull said, the software allows cellphone companies to
configure "preference palettes" geared toward different types of users.
So wireless carriers could set up sample profiles for a college student,
an office worker, a heavy user or a casual user.
"As users get accustomed
to it," Mr. Hull said, "service providers will have the flexibility to
add some sophistication over time."
To use the software's
features, consumers will need a wireless carrier that has installed the
technology on its network. Bell Labs is negotiating with several
cellphone companies to conduct trials, and Mr. Hull said the hope was
that the technology could be available to customers in 2005.
Whether marketers'
enthusiasm for cellphone advertising will remain high until then is
unclear. Jonathan Linner, chief executive of Enpocket, a
wireless-marketing firm, said only about 1 percent of its campaigns use
location-based advertising. "There has to be a good reason to use
location, and most of the time there isn't one," Mr. Linner said. For
instance, cellphone users would probably be annoyed if every time they
passed a
Starbucks, a coupon was sent to their phones, he said.
In a few cases, however,
Mr. Linner said, advertising focused on a person's whereabouts is
effective. Enpocket created a campaign for a London taxi company that
enables cellphone users to call a central number and connect with the
nearest available cab driver within seconds.
While privacy advocates
like Mr. Catlett of Junkbusters are skeptical that most cellphone users
will reveal their location even if it means getting free offers, Mr.
Linner said that research by his company showed that most people who
initially opposed the idea changed their mind after they received an
offer on their phone.
John Siewierski, manager
of e-commerce for GearDirect.com, took part in a four-month test of
wireless advertising in Boulder, Colo., in 2000, and he said he used
several dining coupons that were sent to him. He liked the service
partly because he received only a few messages a day.
"If I was getting stuff
all day long, then I would have turned it off," Mr. Siewierski said.
"It's a great idea, but you need something to filter out the offers when
you're busy."
|
|
RBOCs Dodge Antitrust Bullet |
| This month's
Supreme Court ruling that prohibits antitrust actions being taken
against incumbent carriers for Telecom Act violations removed a cloud of
potentially significant financial liability from ILECs and left CLECs
without a weapon to combat incumbents' provisioning misdeeds.
The
unanimous decision -- that the New York law firm of Curtis Trinko cannot
file an antitrust suit against Verizon Communications for slow
provisioning and maintenance -- was not a surprise to the legal
community. |
|
|

|
|
|
|
Home | About Us | TSG Services | TSG Newsletters | TSG Officers | Client List | Contact Total Solutions Group
© Copyright 2003 Total Solutions Group, All Rights Reserved 1-877-455-3074
|
|
|